criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.Online access to civil and criminal cases in pick circuit courts. Cases can be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
four. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness with the alleged occurrence and also the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to generally be the real brothers of the deceased but they didn't react in the slightest degree to your confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of events that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak variety of evidence which could be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can also be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light at the place, case law on hostile witness where they allegedly noticed the petitioners together with a motorcycle at 4.
Note: Please fill any industry and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave field blank.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. When the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided because of the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained around the record to attach the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. Even though punishment of the alleged offence does not drop inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion on the same is hereby reproduced:
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
Upholding Justice: The application of the law as well as the subsequent punishment with the guilty party provide a sense of closure and justice towards the victim’s family and loved types.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer and even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
When the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for the possibility of reconsideration or commutation from the sentence in certain circumstances.